Gals #67, #68, #69, and #70, have legs, and they have fun using them, in this Wikipedia photo. They all exemplify the definition of femininity.
I would like to add this to my list: Hosiery In Wikimedia. So, if you could help me to decide, then I would very grateful. If you need to see a bigger version, just right click on the photo, and then open it up. What do you think?
There are more Is She Wearing
photos. The link is also in the right column, under Popular Topics
. For those of you just joining us, read the explanation of Is She Wearing Pantyhose?
.
There are Is He Wearing
photos. The link is also in the right column, under Popular Topics
. For those of you just joining us, read the explanation of Is He Wearing Pantyhose?
.
There are Wikimedia
hosiery photos. The link is also in the right column, under Popular Topics
. For those of you just joining us, read the explanation of Hosiery In Wikimedia
.
I would have to say yes to all 4 of them. Starting on the left, looking at the top foot, the smoothness makes it look like she has pantyhose on. Next one to the right (In blue), what little you can see of her knee above the socks, looks like she is wearing. Next one going right you can defiantly tell that she is wearing pantyhose by the sheen on her knees. Then on the far right, her legs look to smooth to not be wearing pantyhose. So those are my reasons for saying yes, they are all wearing.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you exactly for 3 of them, and I agree with you for a different reason for the last.
DeleteThe smoothness is the give away for #67.
#68 is debatable, but the small glimpse is enough to make a good case for it.
#69 definitely does have some sheen.
#70's legs seem too dark. Notice how dark her legs are compared to say her face of chest. The legs also get direct sun light at certain points, so there should be similar colour, but her legs are completely tanned--beautifully tanned.